Skip to main content

Brief Conversation with DW Akademie about Situation of Democracy in Cambodia 

Ou Ritthy is a political blogger in Cambodia. In the run up to the UN's “International Day of Democracy” on September 15, DW Akademie asked its Asian partners and democracy and human rights activists how they see democratization in their countries. NOTE: The views expressed in this series of posts are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect DW Akademie’s assessment of the situation.

  • How would you rate democracy in Cambodia on a scale from 1 to 10? 1 means that you don’t see any democracy at all in Cambodia and 10 means that you see Cambodia as a fully functioning democracy.
Ou Ritthy: It’s hard to give a rating for democracy in Cambodia. Yet, I have observed that for the last year - after the so-called culture of dialogue of the leaders of the ruling CPP and opposition CNRP came to an end - the democratic situation as a whole has increasingly deteriorated. We’ve seen the arrests and imprisonment of human rights defenders, members of the opposition party CNRP, active youth and the assassination of the most prominent analyst, Dr. Kem Ley.
  • What do you see as the most serious shortcomings in Cambodia’s democratic development?
Ou Ritthy: I personally call the democracy in Cambodia an “illiberal democracy” because it primarily functions without rule of law and without an equal playing field of political participation. Additionally, “abuse of power” from the ruling political leaders has been a main threat to Cambodia’s democratic development. They have used political power and connections to interfere and manipulate, in order to get advantages, favors and special interests without following the hierarchy of public administration.
  • What are you proud of in terms of the democratic development in Cambodia?
Ou Ritthy: I’m at the same time very proud of active youth who are courageous to form different kinds of community-based and grassroots organizations and informal groups and clubs in many different sectors. These range from fine arts, business, environment, human rights to partisan and nonpartisan political activism.
  • How can the media help democratization in Cambodia?
Ou Ritthy: The youth have used social media to network one another and express their voices. In this respect, social media can be used to hold Cambodian government accountable because the young voters are the majority and the game changers for the coming elections. Of course, the expression via social media can be monitored and censored, but it cannot be controlled by the Cambodian government. So this is the only effective channel for freedom of expression for the dynamic Cambodian youth. Hence, through the active use of the social media, it makes the democratic sphere in Cambodia look less like “the worst”.

Popular posts from this blog

Sam Rainsy’s Remote Control Leadership

Sam Rainsy’s Remote Control Leadership The imprisonment of the CNRP activists, senior officials and senator, brutal violence against the two CNRP parliamentarians , removal of Kem Sokha from first vice president of national assembly, PM Hun Sen calling opposition leader Sam Rainsy “Son of traitor” and the arrest warrant against Sam Rainsy are a series of unfair, unethical, unlawful and politically motivated events. These events have not only dramatically affected the popularity of PM Hun Sen and the CPP as a whole but also have created sympathy from many rational CPP’s supporters and intellectuals due to the dreadful treatments on the CNRP activists and leaders. The CNRP gained the momentum extraordinarily.  Print Screen from Sam Rainsy's Facebook Page   Then came again the old assignment PM Hun Sen used to test the bravery of Mr. Rainsy who paired the photos of himself and Aung San Suu Kyi on his Facebook page to inspire CHANGE in Cambodia. Mr. Rainsy’s callin...

Cambodian Diaspora Start-Up

  No Matter Where You Are, Cambodia Needs You!   Photo from internet Are you interested in understanding and helping Cambodia? If so, join Diaspora Startup to network with other Cambodian diasporas and youth who are presently living in Cambodia in order to understand the current Cambodia 's state of affairs and culture and to initiate development related projects.  Members of the Diaspora Startup are expected to engage in the following potential p ro jec ts :       Understand Cambodia : We provide news briefs and discuss the current economics and sociopolitical development. Impact Cambodia : W e discuss and plan for the start-ups, impact investments, social enterprises in Cambodia. We share success stories, best practices, and lessons learnt from other countries. What and how can they do better in Cambodia. We consider three following activities:    Startup: discuss and collect potential and relevant idea...

Kem Sokha’s Emphatic Strategy

Kem Sokha’s Emphatic Strategy Emphatic-Creative-Hypnotizing Speech    (Reflecting Kem Sokha’s speech in the U.S. last week Click here to listen to his 26-minute speech )  Kem Sokha (Photocredit: The Phnom Penh Post) Kem Sokha shows his gratitude to the supporters for their devotions and uses strategy to get empathy and sympathy from the his followers.   Kem Sokha wholeheartedly apologizes and accepts mistake for not following Khmer diaspora’s desire (to use people power to bring about change during the mass demonstration).     Kem Sokha throws the ball to the USA as the one who kept pressuring him not to hold mass demonstration because he knows Khmer Diasporas are more obedient to the US decision in terms of sound democratic modeling and influencing on Cambodia (Khmer diaspora believes only the US that can help liberate the country from Vietnam. Not China because China is perceived as a communist state according to them.) ...

Hard-hitting Global Witness Report

Hard-hitting Global Witness Report on HOSTILE TAKEOVER How Cambodia’s ruling family are pulling the strings on the economy and amassing vast personal fortunes with extreme consequences for the population.  From Global Witness Report The Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) has been in power for more than 30 years and has purposely blurred the distinction between private and public interests. The CPP has skillfully structured their top political leaders and financial elites to run the political and business affairs of the party and the country. They appoint their children (next generation) as the future leaders to control significant state institutions and business cooperates ranging from armed forces to youth, mass media to major businesses. Such leadership leads to rampant corruption, nepotism and abuse of power in the country.   Basically, the term “neo-patrimonialism” would best describes the leadership of the CPP government because the powerful political l...
New Political Parties Are Mushrooming in Cambodia Political Parties Contested in July 2013 National Election The late development of political behaviors of active citizens is worth noticing that within one year and five months only after the end of a year-long political deadlock (28 July 2013 - 22 July 2014) eight newly-established political parties have officially registered and a few more groups are considering to create political parties, most probably before the commune election 2017.   The creation of NGOs working on human rights and democracy is being complicated due to the LANGO but the creation of political parties is very much easy and welcomed by the government. The opposition leader Sam Rainsy has monopolized the team “Democracy” and Mr. Rainsy and his party have already been perceived as the icon of democratic change in Cambodia by the grassroots supporters. Sam Riansy used to say without him and CNRP no one can challenge PM Hun Sen; this is definite...