Brief Conversation with DW Akademie about Situation of Democracy in Cambodia
Ou Ritthy is a political
blogger in Cambodia. In the run up to the UN's “International Day of Democracy”
on September 15, DW Akademie asked its Asian partners and democracy and human
rights activists how they see democratization in their countries. NOTE: The
views expressed in this series of posts are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect DW Akademie’s assessment of the situation.
- How would you rate democracy in Cambodia on a scale from 1 to 10? 1 means that you don’t see any democracy at all in Cambodia and 10 means that you see Cambodia as a fully functioning democracy.
Ou Ritthy: It’s hard to give a
rating for democracy in Cambodia. Yet, I have observed that for the last year -
after the so-called culture of dialogue of the leaders of the ruling CPP and
opposition CNRP came to an end - the democratic situation as a whole has
increasingly deteriorated. We’ve seen the arrests and imprisonment of human
rights defenders, members of the opposition party CNRP, active youth and the
assassination of the most prominent analyst, Dr. Kem Ley.
- What do you see as the most serious shortcomings in Cambodia’s democratic development?
Ou Ritthy: I personally call
the democracy in Cambodia an “illiberal democracy” because it primarily
functions without rule of law and without an equal playing field of political
participation. Additionally, “abuse of power” from the ruling political leaders
has been a main threat to Cambodia’s democratic development. They have used
political power and connections to interfere and manipulate, in order to get
advantages, favors and special interests without following the hierarchy of
public administration.
- What are you proud of in terms of the democratic development in Cambodia?
Ou Ritthy: I’m at the same time
very proud of active youth who are courageous to form different kinds of
community-based and grassroots organizations and informal groups and clubs in
many different sectors. These range from fine arts, business, environment,
human rights to partisan and nonpartisan political activism.
- How can the media help democratization in Cambodia?
Ou Ritthy: The youth have used
social media to network one another and express their voices. In this respect,
social media can be used to hold Cambodian government accountable because the
young voters are the majority and the game changers for the coming elections.
Of course, the expression via social media can be monitored and censored, but
it cannot be controlled by the Cambodian government. So this is the only
effective channel for freedom of expression for the dynamic Cambodian youth.
Hence, through the active use of the social media, it makes the democratic
sphere in Cambodia look less like “the worst”.